ICE Detention

This category focuses on the realities of immigration detention in the United States, examining how U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operates detention facilities and the impact of confinement on immigrant communities. Coverage includes conditions inside detention centers, access to medical care and legal representation, policy changes, litigation, and first-hand accounts from those detained. By tracking developments in detention practices and oversight, this section sheds light on one of the most controversial aspects of immigration enforcement.

Beyond the Shadow of Zadvydas: The Unlawful Re-Detention of CAT-Protected Noncitizens and the Erosion of Due Process, Part I

Part One Abstract This Article examines the recent phenomenon of re-detaining noncitizens who have been granted protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) and released pursuant to Orders of Supervision. These individuals, many of whom have lived law-abiding lives for years, are being re-detained based on minor or dated criminal convictions. At the same time, […]

Beyond the Shadow of Zadvydas: The Unlawful Re-Detention of CAT-Protected Noncitizens and the Erosion of Due Process, Part I Read More »

Beyond the Shadow of Zadvydas: The Unlawful Re-Detention of CAT-Protected Noncitizens and the Erosion of Due Process, II

Part Two Government Practice and Third-Country Removal Attempts A. The Shift in Enforcement Priorities and the Revival of Re-Detention The statutory and constitutional safeguards articulated in Zadvydas and Clark have, for two decades, established clear limits on post-removal detention. Yet in recent years, the Department of Homeland Security has quietly revived the practice of re-detaining

Beyond the Shadow of Zadvydas: The Unlawful Re-Detention of CAT-Protected Noncitizens and the Erosion of Due Process, II Read More »

Beyond the Shadow of Zadvydas: The Unlawful Re-Detention of CAT-Protected Noncitizens and the Erosion of Due Process, Part III

Part Three Constitutional and Policy Critique A. Due Process and the Limits of Executive Power The Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause applies to all persons within the territory of the United States, irrespective of citizenship or immigration status.¹ This principle—traced from Yick Wo v. Hopkins through Zadvydas v. Davis reflects a foundational axiom of constitutional

Beyond the Shadow of Zadvydas: The Unlawful Re-Detention of CAT-Protected Noncitizens and the Erosion of Due Process, Part III Read More »

Federal Court Orders Release of Longtime Resident Held by ICE Without Hope of Removal

A Victory for Fairness and Due Process A federal judge in Maryland has ordered the release of Vincent Douglas, a longtime U.S. resident who was being detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) even though there was no realistic chance he could be deported. The case Douglas v. Baker, decided on October 24, 2025, is

Federal Court Orders Release of Longtime Resident Held by ICE Without Hope of Removal Read More »

Texas Federal Judge Orders ICE to Free Immigrant Detained Without Cause

A Strong Rebuke from a Conservative Texas Court A federal judge in Texas has ruled that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) violated the law and the Constitution when it detained a longtime U.S. resident who could not be deported anywhere. The decision, Villanueva v. Tate, issued on September 26, 2025, by Judge David Hittner, a

Texas Federal Judge Orders ICE to Free Immigrant Detained Without Cause Read More »

California Federal Court Stops ICE from Re-Detaining Immigrant Protected from Removal

In a powerful decision out of the Northern District of California, Judge Edward M. Chen ruled that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) violated federal law and the Constitution when it tried to re-detain a man who had long been living lawfully under supervision. The case Salcedo Aceros v. Kaiser (N.D. Cal., July 2025) reinforces a

California Federal Court Stops ICE from Re-Detaining Immigrant Protected from Removal Read More »

Federal Courts Rein In Deportations: Interior Expedited Removal Blocked, Minors’ Flights Halted, ICE Heads to Chicago

A federal court restored judicial oversight to deportation policy by halting the expansion of expedited removals to individuals residing in the United States. Simultaneously, a judge blocked the deportation of unaccompanied Guatemalan minors, reinforcing procedural and humanitarian safeguards. Key Developments September 1, 2025 – Judge Jia M. Cobb halts expanded interior expedited removalsIn Washington, D.C., U.S. District Judge

Federal Courts Rein In Deportations: Interior Expedited Removal Blocked, Minors’ Flights Halted, ICE Heads to Chicago Read More »

Rwanda’s Human‑Rights Record & U.S. Legal Obligations When Sending CAT‑Protected Aliens to Third Countries

Prepared for senior U.S. Department of Justice and Department of State officials Date: September 1, 2025 I. Executive Summary Rwanda’s systemic pattern of torture, arbitrary detention, and denial of fundamental freedoms, as documented by the U.S. State Department, Amnesty International, HRW, and EU/UK agencies, demonstrates a substantial risk of torture for any individual sent there, especially Iranian political

Rwanda’s Human‑Rights Record & U.S. Legal Obligations When Sending CAT‑Protected Aliens to Third Countries Read More »

Human Rights Record of Uganda

REPORT ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS RECORD OF UGANDA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DEPORTATION OF INDIVIDUALS WITH PROTECTION UNDER THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE Date: August 31, 2025 No U.S. official is above the law when it comes to torture. The Convention Against Torture (CAT) is not a diplomatic suggestion. It is codified, enforceable, and criminally

Human Rights Record of Uganda Read More »

Iranian Nationals Face “Anywhere‑But‑Iran” Removals as U.S.–Rwanda Pipeline Opens and Uganda Signs On

The U.S.–Rwanda transfer pipeline is now live, Uganda says it’s in, and the Supreme Court’s late‑June order kept DHS’s third‑country playbook humming. For Iranian nationals who cannot lawfully be returned to Iran under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), that combination means a sharper risk of “elsewhere” removals—with chain‑refoulement a foreseeable, not theoretical, outcome. This month

Iranian Nationals Face “Anywhere‑But‑Iran” Removals as U.S.–Rwanda Pipeline Opens and Uganda Signs On Read More »