Deportation/ Removal

This section covers news, analysis, and legal developments surrounding deportation and removal proceedings in the United States. We examine how immigration laws are applied in practice, including the rights of individuals facing removal, due process protections, and the role of agencies such as ICE and the immigration courts. From policy shifts and landmark cases to stories of those directly impacted, this category provides critical insight into one of the most urgent issues in immigration law.

Federal Courts Rein In Deportations: Interior Expedited Removal Blocked, Minors’ Flights Halted, ICE Heads to Chicago

A federal court restored judicial oversight to deportation policy by halting the expansion of expedited removals to individuals residing in the United States. Simultaneously, a judge blocked the deportation of unaccompanied Guatemalan minors, reinforcing procedural and humanitarian safeguards. Key Developments September 1, 2025 – Judge Jia M. Cobb halts expanded interior expedited removalsIn Washington, D.C., U.S. District Judge […]

Federal Courts Rein In Deportations: Interior Expedited Removal Blocked, Minors’ Flights Halted, ICE Heads to Chicago Read More »

Rwanda’s Human‑Rights Record & U.S. Legal Obligations When Sending CAT‑Protected Aliens to Third Countries

Prepared for senior U.S. Department of Justice and Department of State officials Date: September 1, 2025 I. Executive Summary Rwanda’s systemic pattern of torture, arbitrary detention, and denial of fundamental freedoms, as documented by the U.S. State Department, Amnesty International, HRW, and EU/UK agencies, demonstrates a substantial risk of torture for any individual sent there, especially Iranian political

Rwanda’s Human‑Rights Record & U.S. Legal Obligations When Sending CAT‑Protected Aliens to Third Countries Read More »

Human Rights Record of Uganda

REPORT ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS RECORD OF UGANDA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DEPORTATION OF INDIVIDUALS WITH PROTECTION UNDER THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE Date: August 31, 2025 No U.S. official is above the law when it comes to torture. The Convention Against Torture (CAT) is not a diplomatic suggestion. It is codified, enforceable, and criminally

Human Rights Record of Uganda Read More »

Iranian Nationals Face “Anywhere‑But‑Iran” Removals as U.S.–Rwanda Pipeline Opens and Uganda Signs On

The U.S.–Rwanda transfer pipeline is now live, Uganda says it’s in, and the Supreme Court’s late‑June order kept DHS’s third‑country playbook humming. For Iranian nationals who cannot lawfully be returned to Iran under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), that combination means a sharper risk of “elsewhere” removals—with chain‑refoulement a foreseeable, not theoretical, outcome. This month

Iranian Nationals Face “Anywhere‑But‑Iran” Removals as U.S.–Rwanda Pipeline Opens and Uganda Signs On Read More »

Federal Judge Blocks Expanded Deportation Powers as CAT Recipients Face New Third-Country Threat

A federal judge delivered a significant blow to the Trump administration’s deportation machinery yesterday, blocking the expansion of expedited removal procedures that would have allowed immigration agents to quickly deport migrants detained in the interior without hearings. CBS News. Yet even as Judge Jia Cobb’s ruling temporarily shields some immigrants from rapid deportation, thousands of

Federal Judge Blocks Expanded Deportation Powers as CAT Recipients Face New Third-Country Threat Read More »

United States Deports First Migrants to Rwanda Under Third‑Country Resettlement Agreement

Top Developments 1. United States Deports First Migrants to Rwanda Under Third‑Country Resettlement Agreement (August 28, 2025)Reuters reports that seven migrants were sent to Rwanda under a deal allowing up to 250 U.S. deportations to that country. Rwanda provides support services—healthcare, housing, and job training—while human rights groups warn of inadequate protections and a lack of individual

United States Deports First Migrants to Rwanda Under Third‑Country Resettlement Agreement Read More »

Statutory and constitutional arguments surrounding Third‑Country Removals, and Prolonged ICE Detention

What Happened In mid‑2025, detention and removal policy hardened again. Internal guidance reported by Reuters (July 15, 2025) described a push to limit release and deny bond hearings in broad swaths of cases. Days earlier, the Washington Post (July 14, 2025) reported a memo declaring millions ineligible for immigration‑court bond hearings while their cases are

Statutory and constitutional arguments surrounding Third‑Country Removals, and Prolonged ICE Detention Read More »

Rwanda human rights record and third country deportations. Why CAT protected Iranians and people with serious mental illness should not be sent to Rwanda or Uganda

Rwanda presents an image of order and progress. Clean streets. Smart conferences. An assertive foreign policy. Yet the most credible monitors describe a different reality inside police stations, prisons, and unofficial detention sites. Recent reporting by Human Rights Watch documents longstanding torture and ill treatment. Amnesty International and the United States Department of State record

Rwanda human rights record and third country deportations. Why CAT protected Iranians and people with serious mental illness should not be sent to Rwanda or Uganda Read More »

A Protection Paradox: U.S. Accused of Outsourcing Torture Risk for Immigrants

SAN FRANCISCO — An immigrant, after fleeing threats of brutalization in his native country, convinces a U.S. immigration judge of a stark truth: if deported home, he will more likely than not be tortured. He wins deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The relief is fragile, but real. Then it is abruptly

A Protection Paradox: U.S. Accused of Outsourcing Torture Risk for Immigrants Read More »

Wrongfully Deported Man Detained Again—Courts Pause ICE Deportation to Third Country

In late August 2025, U.S. immigration enforcement once again collided with constitutional limits. Over just two days, a man previously deported under contested practices was taken back into ICE custody, with federal courts stepping in to block his immediate removal. The case has exposed sharp tensions over third-country deportations, a practice that has been steadily

Wrongfully Deported Man Detained Again—Courts Pause ICE Deportation to Third Country Read More »